Time to get a move on with Church Street regeneration say Labour

Church Street Labour Councillor Barbara Grahame says:

“In 2010 the council published its Housing Renewal Strategy which identified Church Street for renewal. Church Street was selected because with 11,000 residents in 5,000 households it had:

  • 78% children lived in income deprived households
  • 22% residents were overcrowded
  • 19% unemployed
  • The life expectancy gap between Church Street and Knightsbridge was around 12 years
  • The council owned 80% land in the Ward as the predominant freeholder so had the power to intervene and develop.

So why not regenerate? A Futures Plan was developed in 2011, taken to Cabinet, procrastinated, an infrastructure plan followed and in May 2013, 87% residents in a 25.5% turnout voted in favour of the council’s regeneration proposal. That’s actually a fantastic turnout for a ballot of this kind.

So, an ideal situation for the Council:  well informed residents and stakeholders who voted in favour of redevelopment, who understood the challenges of decants and demolition.    And the council as landlord owned all the development land.   So, what could go wrong?

What has been achieved against target outcomes?

The target outcomes were:

  • Between 275 and 315 new private and affordable homes spread over 4 sites, plus the re-provision of an old peoples’ home;
  • Improvement to retained blocks closest to the development sites
  • Improved community and health facilities and a new children’s play space
  • Alongside an improved Church Street Market, improved public realm and greening, better maintenance, and targeted local employment.

What is to be seen on the ground?

  • Today, in 2017, only 3 new exemplar flats have been built, massively over cost so they cannot be replicated.
  • Contractors still scrabbling underground to dig foundations for the new old people’s home whilst the old people wonder if they’ll still be alive by the target completion date of 2019.
  • The valuable Luton Street and Cosway Street sites have been left undeveloped because of council delays and indecision.
  • Just one community facility completed, Tresham House, now a hive of activity with 2 nurseries, a play centre including disabled children, and an Evangelical Church on the roof. Wonderful, but clearly nowhere near expectations.

And of course, in the meantime the property market has moved downwards so valuable sites will not generate the estimated funds to pay for affordable housing and other benefits.

There is a feeling in Church Street that the council is actually frightened of taking the next step.

The Council’s new Masterplan is being developed in near secrecy. It will be ‘launched’ in September hidden from view, inside 99 Church Street, to invited guests and the minimum residents.

Church Street Labour Councillors say – Get a move on and start building!”

This entry was posted in Church Street, Church Street Market, Council housing, Futures Programme and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Time to get a move on with Church Street regeneration say Labour

  1. Do you think the fact that it is not a Conservative voting ward could partly explain the delay? The Council needs to set an example to the country and show that residents in social housing are worth caring for!

  2. Pingback: Time to get a move on with Church Street regeneration say Labour « Tim Forrest's E & A

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s